4.8 Article

Exploring hydrogen molybdenum bronze for sodium ion storage: Performance enhancement by vertical graphene core and conductive polymer shell

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 44, Issue -, Pages 265-271

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.012

Keywords

Hydrogen molybdenum bronze; Vertical graphene; Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythio-phene); Sandwich array; Sodium ion battery

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51502263, 51772272, 21403306]
  2. Qianjiang Talents Plan D [QJD1602029]
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China [IRT13037]
  4. Startup Foundation for Hundred-Talent Program of Zhejiang University
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015XZZX010-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rational construction of high-performance electrode materials is crucial for advancement of sodium ion batteries (SIBs). In this work, for the first time, we explore the sodium ion storage performance of hydrogen molybdenum bronze (HMB). To perfect its performance, we controllably sandwich HMB into conductive vertical graphene (VG) skeleton and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) shell forming free-standing VG/HMB/PEDOT composite arrays with the help of powerful successive electrodeposition methods. HMB is completely compatible with VG and PEDOT, and intimately combined with them. Due to the unique integrated porous structure and omni-bearing conductive network, the designed VG/HMB/PEDOT composite arrays show high sodium ion storage capacities (385 mA h g(-1) at 200 mA g(-1)) and superior long-term cycling stability (320 mA h g(-1) at 200 mA g(-1) after 500 cycles) when used as anode of SIBs, much better than the VG/HMB and HMB/PEDOT counterparts. Our proposed fabrication strategy offers a new route for designing high-performance electrodes for applications in electrochemical energy storage and electrocatalysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available