4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

The Contribution of Low-Energy Protons to the Total On-Orbit SEU Rate

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages 2440-2451

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2015.2486763

Keywords

Angular effects; error rate prediction; proton direct ionization; secondary protons; single-event effects (SEEs)

Funding

  1. TRIUMF through the National Research Council of Canada
  2. Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at Sandia National Laboratories
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC04-94AL85000]
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  5. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1265957] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low- and high-energy proton experimental data and error rate predictions are presented for many bulk Si and SOI circuits from the 20-90 nm technology nodes to quantify how much low-energy protons (LEPs) can contribute to the total on-orbit single-event upset (SEU) rate. Every effort was made to predict LEP error rates that are conservatively high; even secondary protons generated in the spacecraft shielding have been included in the analysis. Across all the environments and circuits investigated, and when operating within 10% of the nominal operating voltage, LEPs were found to increase the total SEU rate to up to 4.3 times as high as it would have been in the absence of LEPs. Therefore, the best approach to account for LEP effects may be to calculate the total error rate from high-energy protons and heavy ions, and then multiply it by a safety margin of 5. If that error rate can be tolerated then our findings suggest that it is justified to waive LEP tests in certain situations. Trends were observed in the LEP angular responses of the circuits tested. Grazing angles were the worst case for the SOI circuits, whereas the worst-case angle was at or near normal incidence for the bulk circuits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available