4.5 Article

Experimental Behavior of Large Reinforced Concrete Specimen with Heavy ASR and DEF Deterioration

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 144, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002102

Keywords

Alkali silica reaction (ASR); Delayed ettringite formation (DEF); Force-deformation behavior; Reinforced concrete

Funding

  1. Texas Department of Transportation [0-5997]
  2. Federal Highway Administration [0-5997]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Slight and moderate amounts of deterioration caused by alkali silica reaction (ASR)/delayed ettringite formation (DEF)-induced expansion in reinforced concrete specimens do not markedly or detrimentally affect its structural load-carrying capacity. However, effects of severe (late-stage) ASR/DEF deterioration on the load-carrying capacity of structures is not known. A large-scale reinforced concrete C-beam specimen with heavy ASR/DEF deterioration is load tested in the laboratory. A comparison of the force-deformation results of the severely deteriorated specimen with the undamaged control specimen, and slightly and moderately ASR/DEF-deteriorated specimens, shows that there is no reduction in the load-carrying capacity. The mode of failure of the specimen is a brittle joint-shear failure similar to the other C-beam specimens. However, a reduction in the ductility of the heavily deteriorated specimen is observed. Postfailure examination shows a significant degree of corrosion in the longitudinal and transverse reinforcement. Significant bulging and complete debonding of the lapped transverse U-bars in the specimen knee-joint caused considerable loss in confinement of the softened concrete, resulting in an embrittled performance and sudden early loss of load in the heavily damaged specimen. It is not known how further corrosion in conjunction with severe ASR/DEF deterioration could affect the future behavior of the structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available