4.5 Article

Shake Table Studies and Analysis of a PT-UHPC Bridge Column with Pocket Connection

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 144, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001997

Keywords

Accelerated bridge construction (ABC); Pocket connection; Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC); Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) tendon; Precast posttensioned (PT) column

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Transportation through the Accelerated Bridge Construction University Transportation Center (ABC-UTC) [DTRT13-GUTC41]
  2. Florida International University
  3. Iowa State University
  4. University of Nevada (UNR)
  5. NDOT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducts shake table studies and analysis of a large-scale novel posttensioned (PT) precast bridge column connected to a precast footing with a pocket connection. The primary objective is to develop a resilient square precast bridge column with minimal residual lateral displacement and plastic hinge damage when subjected to strong earthquakes. Another objective is to evaluate a column-footing pocket connection. The column is posttensioned with unbonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) tendons to eliminate permanent drifts. To mitigate seismic damage, ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) is used in the plastic hinge zone of the column. The column model is subjected to the 1994 Northridge-Rinaldi earthquake record with increasing amplitudes until failure. Experimental results show that the drift ratio and displacement ductility capacity of the column are 6.9 and 13.8%, respectively, and the residual displacement is negligible. Furthermore, the pocket connection is effective in forming the plastic hinge in the column with no connection damage. Another finding of the study is that available fiber element models lead to close correlation between the measured and calculated responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available