4.3 Article

Numerical simulation of pipeline hydrate particle agglomeration based on population balance theory

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 251-261

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2018.01.009

Keywords

Hydrate; Agglomeration; Population balance; Dynamic model; Numerical simulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51006120]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [14CX02207A, 17CX05006, 17CX06017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In offshore operations, the agglomeration between hydrate particles is a significant reason that could lead to pipeline hydrate plugging. Dynamic modeling and numerical simulation of pipeline hydrate particle agglomeration are of great importance to offshore hydrate management. For this purpose, a dynamic model of hydrate agglomeration was proposed and then used to simulate pipeline hydrate particle agglomeration in this paper. The dynamic model was established based on population balance equation, which took both hydrate agglomeration and hydrate breakage into consideration. Collision frequency, agglomeration efficiency, breakage frequency and size distribution of the sub particles resulting from particle breakage are four key parameters that involved in the dynamic model. Combined with several traditional solid-liquid flow models, the dynamic model was solved by the CFD software FLUENT 14.5 to simulate the agglomeration process of hydrate particles in the pipeline at different conditions. The influences of flow rate and hydrate volume fraction on the agglomeration process were analyzed emphatically. The simulation results were also compared with the calculation results of hydrate particle growth model and hydrate rheological model. The conclusions of this paper can provide guidance for the development of deep water flow assurance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available