4.6 Review

Mn2+ and Mn4+ red phosphors: synthesis, luminescence and applications in WLEDs. A review

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages 2652-2671

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8tc00251g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51662039, 21661033, 21771195]
  2. Yunnan Province [U1702254, U1301242]
  3. Guangdong Province [U1702254, U1301242]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A030313305]
  5. Special Funds of Guangdong Province Project for Applied Science and Technology Research and Development [2017B090917001, 2016B090931007, 2015B090927002]
  6. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou City [20160401005]
  7. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [171022]
  8. Programme for the Foreign Experts [W2017011]
  9. Wenfeng High-end Talents Project [W2016-01]
  10. China-Poland Intergovernmental Science and Technology Cooperation Program [2015[170]/36-13]
  11. Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia [GLTFY0111PR]
  12. European Regional Development Fund [TK141]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transition-metal activated phosphors are an important family of luminescent materials that can produce white light with an outstanding color rendering index and correlated color temperature for use in light-mitting diodes. In recent years, work in this quite ''hot'' research field has focused on the development of Mn2+ and Mn4+ activated red phosphors. In this review article, we provide an overview of recent studies on Mn2+ and Mn4+ doped phosphors, including detailed synthesis routes (solid-state reaction and wet-chemical synthesis) and description of luminescence mechanisms and phosphors' behaviors; discuss their promising applications in white light-emitting diodes; and present an extensive list of references to representative works in this field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available