Journal
POLITICAL THEORY
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 32-57Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0090591711426854
Keywords
Habermas; civil disobedience; agonistic democracy; consensus; aesthetic-expressive action
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Habermas's paradigm of communicative action is usually taken to be pretty much dominated by consensus, Yes-saying. What if this were a radically one-sided perception? We take up this unorthodox position by arguing that no-saying in this paradigm is typically overlooked and underemphasized. To demonstrate this, we consider how negativity is figured at the most basic onto-ethical level in communicative action, as well as expressed in civil disobedience, a phenomenon to which Habermas assigns the remarkable role of touchstone (Prufstein) of constitutional democracy. Once the importance of no-saying is drawn out, the paradigm looks distinctly less hostile to dissensus and agonism in democratic life.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available