4.6 Article

Nitrogen-doped bamboo-like carbon nanotubes as anode material for high performance potassium ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 6, Issue 31, Pages 15162-15169

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta04694h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2017B090916002]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars [2016A030306010]
  3. Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program [2014ZT05N200]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities, China [2017ZX010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Potassium ion batteries (KIBs) have attracted tremendous attention because of the abundance of potassium resources and the applicability of carbonaceous materials for use as anodes, which indicates that the manufacturing techniques of lithium ion batteries can be directly transferred to KIBs. However, the huge volume change during the potassiation/depotassiation process, and the poor kinetics of the large K+ ions seriously restrict the electrochemical performance of graphite because the K+ ions are squeezed into the restricted interlayer spacing. Compared with well-crystallized graphite, amorphous carbon has a more flexible structure, but its capacity contribution is mainly dependent on a capacitive storage mechanism. Therefore, finding a carbon material with a suitable degree of graphitization and structure is necessary to achieve superior electrochemical properties. In the research reported in this paper, nitrogen-doped bamboo-like carbon nanotubes composed of amorphous carbon and discontinuous graphene layers with a porous hollow structure were prepared. Benefiting from its unique structure, this material delivered a high, reversible capacity of 204 mA h g(-1) at 500 mA g(-1) after 1000 cycles, and exhibited a remarkable rate capability of 186 mA h g(-1) at 1000 mA g(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available