4.6 Review

Metal-organic framework derived hollow materials for electrochemical energy storage

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 6, Issue 16, Pages 6754-6771

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta00612a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21475115]
  2. Program for University Innovative Research Team of Henan [15IRTSTHN001]
  3. Henan Provincial Science and Technology innovation team [C20150026]
  4. Nanhu Scholars Program of XYNU
  5. Nanhu Scholars Program for Young Scholars of XYNU
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province [162300410230]
  7. Henan Science and Technology Cooperation Project [172106000064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), a novel class of porous crystalline materials, have drawn enormous attention. Due to the inherent porosity and presence of both metal and organic moieties, MOF-based materials are naturally suitable as versatile precursors and sacrificial templates for a wide variety of metal/carbon-based nanostructured materials, such as metal oxides, metal carbides, metal sulfides and their composites. Recent developments in MOF-derived hollow nanostructures with well-defined interior voids and low density have revealed their extensive capabilities and thus give enhanced performance for energy storage and conversion. In this review, we summarize the recent progress in the fabrication of MOF-derived hollow materials and their applications for energy storage, particularly for lithium-ion batteries, sodium-ion batteries, lithium-Se batteries, lithium-sulfur batteries and supercapacitors. The superiorities of MOF-derived hollow materials are highlighted, and major challenges or opportunities for future research on them for electrochemical energy storage are also discussed, with prospective solutions in the light of current progress in MOF-derived hollow nanostructures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available