4.4 Article

A global view on the Higgs self-coupling at lepton colliders

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2018)178

Keywords

Higgs Physics; Effective Field Theories; Beyond Standard Model

Funding

  1. Office of the National Administrative Committee of Postdoctoral Researchers of China (ONACPR)
  2. DESY
  3. Helmholtz Association
  4. la Caixa, Severo Ochoa grant program
  5. Spanish Ministry MEC [FPA2015-64041-C2-1-P, FPA2014-55613-P, FPA2011-25948]
  6. Generalitat de Catalunya grant [2014-SGR-1450]
  7. Severo Ochoa excellence program of MINECO [SO-2012-0234]
  8. European Commission [631962]
  9. Collaborative Research Center of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Particles, Strings and the Early Universe [SFB676]
  10. CERN Theory division
  11. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  12. United States Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We perform a global effective-field-theory analysis to assess the precision on the determination of the Higgs trilinear self-coupling at future lepton colliders. Two main scenarios are considered, depending on whether the center-of-mass energy of the colliders is sufficient or not to access Higgs pair production processes. Low-energy machines allow for similar to 40% precision on the extraction of the Higgs trilinear coupling through the exploitation of next-to-leading-order effects in single Higgs measurements, provided that runs at both 240/250 GeV and 350 GeV are available with luminosities in the few attobarns range. A global fit, including possible deviations in other SM couplings, is essential in this case to obtain a robust determination of the Higgs self-coupling. High-energy machines can easily achieve a similar to 20% precision through Higgs pair production processes. In this case, the impact of additional coupling modifications is milder, although not completely negligible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available