4.6 Review

Recent progress on confinement of polysulfides through physical and chemical methods

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 1555-1565

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.04.014

Keywords

Lithium-sulfur batteries; Confinement of polysulfides; Physical structure design; Chemical bonding; Shuttle effect

Funding

  1. Basic Science Center Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51788104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772301, 21773264]
  3. National Key RAMP
  4. D Program of China [2016YFA0202500]
  5. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA09010300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With high theoretical energy density and the natural abundance of S, lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are considered to be the promising next generation high-energy rechargeable energy storage devices. However, issues including electronical insulation of S, the lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) dissolution and the short cycle lifespan have prevented Li-S batteries from being practical applied. Feasible settlements of confining LiPSs to reduce the loss of active substances and improve the cycle stability include wrapping sulfur with compact layers, designing matrix with porous or hollow structures, adding adsorbents owning strong interaction with sulfur and inserting polysulfide barriers between cathodes and separators. This review categorizes them into physical and chemical confinements according to the influencing mechanism. With further discussion of their merits and flaws, synergy of the physical and chemical confinement is believed to be the feasible avenue that can guide Li-S batteries to the practical application. (C) 2018 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available