4.6 Article

Ni(OH)2-Ni/C for hydrogen oxidation reaction in alkaline media

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 111-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.02.011

Keywords

Hydrogen oxidation reaction; Fuel cells; Alkaline polymer electrolyte fuel cells; Nickel; Volcano plot

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21573167, 21633008, 91545205]
  2. Innovative Research Team in Wuhan University [2042017kf0232]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFB0101203]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2014203020207]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of the hydrogen electrode is vital for the application of alkaline polymer electrolyte fuel cells (APEFCs). In this study, a series of Ni(OH)(2) decorated Ni/C catalysts (Ni(OH)(2)-Ni/C) were prepared by a three-step electrochemical treatment of Ni/C. The existence of Ni(OH)(2) was demonstrated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and the surface molar ratio of Ni(OH)(2)/Ni of the samples was estimated via an electrochemical method. The HOR catalytic activity of the catalysts was evaluated by a rotation disk electrode (RDE) method, and a volcano plot was established between the HOR exchange current (j(0)) and the surface molar ratio of Ni(OH)(2)/Ni. On top of the volcano, the surface molar ratio of Ni(OH)(2)/Ni is 1.1:1, the j(0) of which was 6.8 times of that of Ni/C. The stability of the samples toward HOR was evaluated to be good. Our study added a systematic experimental evidence to the HOR research, showing that the HOR catalytic activity of Ni can be deliberately controlled via decoration of Ni(OH)(2), which may help understanding the HOR mechanism on Ni. (C) 2018 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available