4.4 Article

Assessment of Muscle Fatigue Associated with Prolonged Standing in the Workplace

Journal

SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 31-42

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.5491/SHAW.2012.3.1.31

Keywords

Prolonged standing; Muscle fatigue; Questionnaire survey; Surface electromyography; Metal stamping industry

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia
  2. Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM)
  3. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) of Malaysia
  4. Mechanical Engineering of Universiti Teknologi MARA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to determine the psychological fatigue and analyze muscle activity of production workers who are performing processes jobs while standing for prolonged time periods. Methods: The psychological fatigue experienced by the workers was obtained through questionnaire surveys. Meanwhile, muscle activity has been analyzed using surface electromyography (sEMG) measurement. Lower extremities muscles include: erector spinae, tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius were concurrently measured for more than five hours of standing. Twenty male production workers in a metal stamping company participated as subjects in this study. The subjects were required to undergo questionnaire surveys and sEMG measurement. Results: Results of the questionnaire surveys found that all subjects experienced psychological fatigue due to prolonged standing jobs. Similarly, muscle fatigue has been identified through sEMG measurement. Based on the non-parametric statistical test using the Spearman's rank order correlation, the left erector spinae obtained a moderate positive correlation and statistically significant (r(s) = 0.552, p < 0.05) between the results of questionnaire surveys and sEMG measurement. Conclusion: Based on this study, the authors concluded that prolonged standing was contributed to psychological fatigue and to muscle fatigue among the production workers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available