4.5 Article

Accumulated Permanent Axial Strain of a Subgrade Fill under Cyclic High-Speed Railway Loading

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001119

Keywords

High-speed railway (HSR); Subgrade; Static compression; Cyclic loading; Permanent axial strain; Resilient modulus

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China via the PolyU Shenzhen Research Institute [U1234204]
  2. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ballastless track system (BTS) is widely adopted in the construction of high-speed railways (HSRs), in which the vehicle-induced cyclic stresses are evenly transferred to subgrade at a smaller amplitude compared with the conventional ballast track system. In this study, both static and cyclic triaxial tests were performed on a subgrade fill procured from a HSR construction site in Mainland China. The subgrade fill contained high fine content (d<0.075 mm). The stress-strain-strength relationship from static tests provided a reference for the cyclic tests. The permanent axial strain and resilient modulus under cyclic HSR loading were studied based on the stress levels in the field. Based on the test data, a new empirical equation is proposed to predict the accumulated permanent axial strain with cycle number and low cyclic deviator stress. A new method for determining all parameters in this equation is proposed and verified by fitting test data. The results show that the predictions from the newly proposed relationship are in good agreement with the experimental results. The resilient behavior of the fill under cyclic loading is also investigated. It is found that under low-stress levels the resilient modulus slightly decreases with the increase of stresses, which is not well described by existing models. (C) 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available