4.7 Article

Wind Turbine Fault Detection and Identification Through PCA-Based Optimal Variable Selection

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 1627-1635

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2018.2801625

Keywords

Variable selection; principal component analysis; fault detection; condition monitoring; wind turbines

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I037326]
  2. Engineering Department at Lancaster University
  3. EPSRC [EP/I037326/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An effective condition monitoring system of wind turbines generally requires installation of a high number of sensors and use of a high sampling frequency in particular for monitoring of the electrical components within a turbine, resulting in a large amount of data. This can become a burden for condition monitoring and fault detection systems. This paper aims to develop algorithms that will allow a reduced dataset to be used in wind turbine fault detection. This paper first proposes a variable selection algorithm based on principal component analysis with multiple selection criteria in order to select a set of variables to target fault signals while still preserving the variation of data in the original dataset. With the selected variables, this paper then describes fault detection and identification algorithms, which can identify faults, determine the corresponding time and location where the fault occurs, and estimate its severity. The proposed algorithms are evaluated with simulation data from PSCAD/EMTDC, Supervisory control and data acquisition data from an operational wind farm, and experimental data from a wind turbine test rig. Results show that the proposed methods can select a reduced set of variables with minimal information last whilst detecting faults efficiently and effectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available