4.6 Article

Reach-Avoid Games With Two Defenders and One Attacker: An Analytical Approach

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages 1035-1046

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2018.2794769

Keywords

Analytical approach; attack region (AR); barrier; differential games; reach-avoid games; winning regions

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61374034, 61210012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper considers a reach-avoid game on a rectangular domain with two defenders and one attacker. The attacker aims to reach a specified edge of the game domain boundary, while the defenders strive to prevent that by capturing the attacker. First, we are concerned with the barrier, which is the boundary of the reach-avoid set, splitting the state space into two disjoint parts: 1) defender dominance region (DDR) and 2) attacker dominance region (ADR). For the initial states lying in the DDR, there exists a strategy for the defenders to intercept the attacker regardless of the attacker's best effort, while for the initial states lying in the ADR, the attacker can always find a successful attack strategy. We propose an attack region method to construct the barrier analytically by employing Voronoi diagram and Apollonius circle for two kinds of speed ratios. Then, by taking practical payoff functions into considerations, we present optimal strategies for the players when their initial states lie in their winning regions, and show that the ADR is divided into several parts corresponding to different strategies for the players. Numerical approaches, which suffer from inherent inaccuracy, have already been utilized for multiplayer reach-avoid games, but computational complexity complicates solving such games and consequently hinders efficient on-line applications. However, this method can obtain the exact formulation of the barrier and is applicable for real-time updates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available