4.7 Article

Facial Expression Recognition in Video with Multiple Feature Fusion

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 38-50

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAFFC.2016.2593719

Keywords

Facial expression recognition; multiple feature fusion; HOG-TOP; geometric warp feature; acoustic feature

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61473243]
  2. Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Video based facial expression recognition has been a long standing problem and attracted growing attention recently. The key to a successful facial expression recognition system is to exploit the potentials of audiovisual modalities and design robust features to effectively characterize the facial appearance and configuration changes caused by facial motions. We propose an effective framework to address this issue in this paper. In our study, both visual modalities (face images) and audio modalities (speech) are utilized. A new feature descriptor called Histogram of Oriented Gradients from Three Orthogonal Planes (HOG-TOP) is proposed to extract dynamic textures from video sequences to characterize facial appearance changes. And a new effective geometric feature derived from the warp transformation of facial landmarks is proposed to capture facial configuration changes. Moreover, the role of audio modalities on recognition is also explored in our study. We applied the multiple feature fusion to tackle the video-based facial expression recognition problems under lab-controlled environment and in the wild, respectively. Experiments conducted on the extended Cohn-Kanade (CK+) database and the Acted Facial Expression in Wild (AFEW) 4.0 database show that our approach is robust in dealing with video-based facial expression recognition problems under lab-controlled environment and in the wild compared with the other state-of-the-art methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available