4.5 Article

Comparing Indoor and Outdoor Soiling Experiments for Different Glass Coatings and Microstructural Analysis of Particle Caking Processes

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 203-209

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2775439

Keywords

Air pollution; coatings; materials testing; solar energy (photovoltaic systems, solar panels); surface contamination

Funding

  1. German Government (BMWI) [0325735C]
  2. PSDA
  3. project SolarChilD (BMBF) [01DN14005]
  4. German Government (BMBF) [03FH014IX4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Within the scope of this study, we present the results of outdoor and indoor soiling experiments with four differently coated glass samples. The outdoor experiments were conducted at the Solar Platform of the Atacama Desert (PSDA) over a duration of about five months. The samples showed large differences in soiling behavior and were characterized with respect to surface coverage of dust particles and transmission loss by light microscopy and optical transmission, respectively. Comparative indoor soiling experiments were performed in a soiling test chamber and reproduced the outdoor behavior of the different coating types. The mechanism of water interaction during dew events was found to be the key influencing factor for the soiling performance of the different coatings. To better understand fundamental soiling mechanisms in the Atacama Desert, soiled glass surfaces were investigated at a microstructural level using electron microscopy. It was found that the silt fraction of particles (>4 mu m) is caked by accumulation and compaction of small, platelet-shaped clay minerals during dew cycles. This caking process can be distinguished from particle cementation induced by water soluble salts and is regarded as an important soiling mechanism, which increases dust adhesion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available