4.5 Article

Realistic Adhesion Test for Photovoltaic Modules Qualification

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 218-223

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2775149

Keywords

Adhesion; backsheet; certification; damp-heat; delamination; EVA; in situ; peel; qualification

Funding

  1. U.K. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council through U.K.-India [EP/H040331/1]
  2. Joint U.K.-India Clean Energy Centre [EP/P003605/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adhesion requirements for photovoltaic modules to ensure reliability are often discussed but not well defined, neither in terms of tests nor actual requirements. This paper presents a new approach for realistic assessment of the adhesion strength, which shows the conventional peel test may not ensure reliability. The test presented reproduces the actual adhesion requirements for fielded modules much more closely than the commonly used peel testing. The test is conducted in situ during standard damp-heat test at a temperature of 85 degrees C and 85% relative humidity, with the modules installed at an angle to give an appropriate force vector perpendicular to the backsheet. This is achieved by attaching weights to the back of the tested samples which are mounted with a 45 degrees angle on a testing rack in the environmental cabinet. With an appropriate weight holder, this could be done as part of the standard damp-heat cycle during certification and would not involve additional testing time nor significant changes in the commonly used racking. This approach will identify the weakest interface of the multilayer encapsulation system. A number of test-to-fail bespoke samples are tested to set realistic fail criteria. It is shown that the test allows discrimination between different samples and can identify unsuitable production processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available