4.6 Article

Phase I trial of plerixafor combined with decitabine in newly diagnosed older patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA
Volume 103, Issue 8, Pages 1308-1316

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2017.183418

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Genzyme/Sanofi Oncology
  2. Clinical and Translational Science Center at Weill Cornell Medical College [UL1-TR000457-06]
  3. [LLS 6427-13]
  4. [DP2 OD007399]
  5. [R01 CA102031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute myeloid leukemia carries a dismal prognosis in older patients. The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of decitabine combined with the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor in newly diagnosed older patients with acute myeloid leukemia and to evaluate the effects of plerixafor on leukemia stem cells. Patients were treated with monthly cycles of decitabine 20 mg/m(2) days 1-10 and escalating doses of plerixafor (320-810 mcg/kg) days 1-5. Sixty-nine patients were treated, with an overall response rate of 43%. Adverse karyotype did not predict response (P=0.31). Prior hypomethylating agent treatment was the strongest independent predictor of adverse overall survival (hazard ratio 3.1; 95% CI: 1.3-7.3; P=0.008) and response (14% in previously treated patients, 46% in treatment naive; P=0.002). As expected, the most common toxicities were myelosuppression and infection. Plerixafor induced mobilization of leukemia stem and progenitor cells, but did not cause clinically significant hyperleukocytosis. Reduction in leukemia stem cells appeared to correlate with duration of response. Plerixafor can be safely added to decitabine in poor-prognosis, elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients. The maximum tolerated dose of the combination was 810 mcg/kg. While mobilization of leukemia stem cells was observed in some patients, the clinical benefit of adding plerixafor was uncertain. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01352650.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available