4.5 Review

Refining the aggregate exposure pathway

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 428-436

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8em00018b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Research Participation Program at the US EPA
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [P30 ES000210]
  3. Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
  4. DOE [DE-AC05-76RLO 1830]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advancements in measurement technologies and modeling capabilities continue to result in an abundance of exposure information, adding to that currently in existence. However, fragmentation within the exposure science community acts as an obstacle for realizing the vision set forth in the National Research Council's report on Exposure Science in the 21(st) century to consider exposures from source to dose, on multiple levels of integration, and to multiple stressors. The concept of an Aggregate Exposure Pathway (AEP) was proposed as a framework for organizing and integrating diverse exposure information that exists across numerous repositories and among multiple scientific fields. A workshop held in May 2016 followed introduction of the AEP concept, allowing members of the exposure science community to provide extensive evaluation and feedback regarding the framework's structure, key components, and applications. The current work briefly introduces topics discussed at the workshop and attempts to address key challenges involved in refining this framework. The resulting evolution in the AEP framework's features allows for facilitating acquisition, integration, organization, and transparent application and communication of exposure knowledge in a manner that is independent of its ultimate use, thereby enabling reuse of such information in many applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available