4.5 Article

The effects of gold nanoparticles on the human blood functions

Journal

ARTIFICIAL CELLS NANOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 720-726

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1468769

Keywords

Gold nanoparticles; nanotoxicity; drug delivery; blood components

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31300697, 31571020, 51403238]
  2. PUMC Youth Fund
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [33320140060, 332015188]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have been widely used as drug delivery systems at several biomedical fields. However, the effect of AuNPs on the components of human blood is not well characterized. AuNPs firstly interacted with blood when using AuNPs as the drug delivery carries. Therefore, it is urgent to investigate the effect of AuNPs (including the ligands of AuNPs) on human blood, especially its components. In this study, we investigated the possible effects of polyethylene glycol-coated AuNPs (PEG@AuNPs) and citric acid-coated AuNPs (CT-AuNPs) on the blood cell function and distribution of those nanoparticles in blood components including erythrocytes, leukocytes, platelets (PLTs) cells and plasma. We found that the amount of CT-AuNPs engulfed by leukocytes was four folds more compared to PEG@AuNPs, indicating that PEGylation might have the ability to escape the immune system. We found that each individual leukocyte uptaked more AuNPs particles than individual platelet. However, there are more PLTs than leukocytes in the blood. The total amount of AuNPs including PEG@AuNPs and CT-AuNPs accumulation in PLTs were more than in leukocytes. Moreover, we found that both CT-AuNPs and PEG@AuNPs-induced PLTs activation at high concentration. We therefore concluded that the interactions between nanodrug delivery systems (AuNPs) and human blood components, especially the PLTs should be careful evaluated prior to their clinical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available