4.6 Article

Can We Reduce the Cellulase Enzyme Loading Required To Achieve Efficient Lignocellulose Deconstruction by Only Using the Initially Absorbed Enzymes?

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 6233-6239

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00004

Keywords

Enzyme adsorption; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Biomass pretreatment; Enzyme recycle; Biorefinery; High solid hydrolysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cost-effective production of sugars from biomass continues to be challenging, partly due to the relatively high enzyme/protein loading required to achieve effective hydrolysis of the insoluble polysaccharides within the pretreated lignocellulosic substrates. Previous work has suggested that those enzymes that initially, strongly adsorb to the insoluble substrate are crucial for effective cellulose hydrolysis. However, most previous work in this topic area has used either purified enzymes or older generations of cellulase preparations acting on model cellulosic substrates. The results were, in several cases, contradictory or inconclusive. In the work reported here, the roles and functions of the initially adsorbed enzymes in determining the rate and extent of cellulose hydrolysis were assessed when using several different pretreated biomass substrates and the Novozyme enzyme preparation, Cellic CTec3. It was apparent that the initially adsorbed enzymes (irreversible bound to substrate after centrifugation) played a critical role as the removal of the free/unadsorbed enzymes in solution resulted in no significant decrease in the rate and extent of cellulose hydrolysis, regardless of the enzyme loading and the substrates used. By removing the initially, free/unadsorbed enzyme, the enzyme loadings required for an effective biomass deconstruction (>70% cellulose hydrolysis yields within 3 days) could be reduced by up to 50%, depending on the substrate used.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available