Journal
WATER
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w10040389
Keywords
gully; valley bottom; erosion; sediment; rehabilitation; restoration; best management practices; enclosures; Africa; Ethiopia
Categories
Funding
- USAID PEER project [AID-OAA-A-11-00012]
- Norman E. Borlaug LEAP, UC Davis
- International Foundation for Science (IFS) [W/5844-1]
- First Presbyterian Church in Ithaca, New York
- Blue Nile Water Institute, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
- Water, Land and Ecosystem (WLE) research project
- Quarit district office of Agriculture
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Rehabilitation of large valley bottom gullies in developing countries is hampered by high cost. Stopping head cuts at the time of initiation will prevent large gullies from forming and is affordable. However, research on practices to control shallow gully heads with local materials is limited. The objective of this research was therefore to identify cost-effective shallow gully head stabilization practices. The four-year study was conducted on 14 shallow gullies (<3 m deep) in the central Ethiopian highlands. Six gullies were used as a control. Heads in the remaining eight gullies were regraded to a 1:1 slope. Additional practices implemented were adding either riprap or vegetation or both on the regraded heads and stabilizing the gully bed downstream. Gully heads were enclosed by fencing to prohibit cattle access to the planted vegetation. The median yearly head retreat of the control gullies was 3.6 m a(-1) with a maximum of 23 m a(-1). Vegetative treatments without riprap prevented gully incision by trapping sediments but did not stop the upslope retreat. The gully heads protected by riprap did not erode. Regrading the slope and adding riprap was most effective in controlling gully head retreat, and with hay grown on the fenced-in areas around the practice, it was profitable for farmers.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available