4.6 Article

Compressed Collagen Enhances Stem Cell Therapy for Corneal Scarring

Journal

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 487-494

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sctm.17-0258

Keywords

Adult stem cells; Animal models; Cellular therapy; Cornea; Myofibroblast; Gene expression; Stromal cells

Funding

  1. Department of Defense [W81XWH-14-1-0465]
  2. NIH [EY016415, P30-EY008098]
  3. Eye and Ear Foundation
  4. Stein Innovation Award from Research to Prevent Blindness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stem cells from human corneal stroma (CSSC) suppress corneal stromal scarring in a mouse wound-healing model and promote regeneration of native transparent tissue (PMID:25504883). This study investigated efficacy of compressed collagen gel (CCG) as a vehicle to deliver CSSC for corneal therapy. CSSC isolated from limbal stroma of human donor corneas were embedded in soluble rat-tendon collagen, gelled at 37 degrees C, and partially dehydrated to a thickness of 100 mu m by passive absorption. The CCG disks were dimensionally stable, easy to handle, and could be adhered securely to de-epithelialized mouse cornea with fibrin-based adhesive. CSSC in CCG maintained >80% viability for >1 week in culture media and could be cryopreserved in 20% fetal bovine serum-10%DMSO in liquid nitrogen. CCG containing as few as 500 CSSC effectively prevented visible scarring and suppressed expression of fibrotic Col3a1 mRNA. CSSC in CCG were more effective at blocking scarring on a per-cell basis than CSSC delivered directly in a fibrin gel as previously described. Collagen-embedded cells retained the ability to suppress corneal scarring after conventional cryopreservation. This study demonstrates use of a common biomaterial that can facilitate storage and handling of stem cells in a manner that may provide off-the-shelf delivery of stem cells as a therapy for corneal scarring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available