4.7 Article

Performance Evaluation of Single-Label and Multi-Label Remote Sensing Image Retrieval Using a Dense Labeling Dataset

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs10060964

Keywords

remote sensing image retrieval (RSIR); multi-label benchmark dataset; multi-label image retrieval; single-label image retrieval; handcrafted features; convolutional neural networks

Funding

  1. National key research and development plan on a Strategic International Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation Special Project [2016YFE0202300]
  2. Wuhan Chen Guang Project [2016070204010114]
  3. Guangzhou Science and Technology Project [201604020070]
  4. Special Task of Technical Innovation in Hubei Province [2016AAA018]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of China [61671332, 41771452, 41771454]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Benchmark datasets are essential for developing and evaluating remote sensing image retrieval (RSIR) approaches. However, most of the existing datasets are single-labeled, with each image in these datasets being annotated by a single label representing the most significant semantic content of the image. This is sufficient for simple problems, such as distinguishing between a building and a beach, but multiple labels are required for more complex problems, such as RSIR. This motivated us to present a new benchmark dataset termed MLRSIR that was labeled from an existing single-labeled remote sensing archive. MLRSIR contained a total of 17 classes, and each image had at least one of 17 pre-defined labels. We evaluated the performance of RSIR methods ranging from traditional handcrafted feature-based methods to deep-learning-based ones on MLRSIR. More specifically, we compared the performances of RSIR methods from both single-label and multi-label perspectives. These results presented the advantages of multiple labels over single labels for interpreting complex remote sensing images, and serve as a baseline for future research on multi-label RSIR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available