4.7 Article

A New Algorithm for MLS-Based DBH Mensuration and Its Preliminary Validation in an Urban Boreal Forest: Aiming at One Cornerstone of Allometry-Based Forest Biometrics

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs10050749

Keywords

diameter at breast height (DBH); mobile laser scanning (MLS); mensuration; allometry; forest biometrics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471281, 31670718, 41401515]
  2. Research Fund for Youth Innovation Program of Remote Sensing Science and Technology
  3. SRF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to improve one basic circle of allometry-based forest biometricsdiameter at breast height (DBH) mensuration. To address its common shortage of low efficiency in field measurement, this study attempted mobile laser scanning (MLS) as an efficient alternative and proposed a new MLS-based DBH mensuration algorithm to further exclude the effect of stem bending. That is, prior to the procedure of cone-based geometric modeling of a tree stem, an operation of Aligning the local stem axis series that is calculated by the Successive Cone-based Fitting of those continuously equi-height-layered laser points on the stem (ASCF) is appended. In the case of an urban boreal forest, tests showed that the proposed algorithm worked better (the coefficient of determination, R-2 = 0.81 and root mean square error, RMSE = 52.1 mm) than the circle- (0.16 and 189.4 mm), cylinder- (0.77 and 58.7 mm), and cone-based (0.77 and 56.7 mm) geometric modeling algorithms. From a methodological viewpoint, the new ASCF algorithm was preliminarily validated for MLS-based tree DBH mensuration, with the cornerstone-rebuilding significance for allometry-based forest biometrics. With the development of MLS variants available for complex forest environments, this study will contribute fundamental implications for advancements in forestry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available