4.5 Article

Spatio-temporal coherence of dengue, chikungunya and Zika outbreaks in Merida, Mexico

Journal

PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006298

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (DEB/EEID award) [1640698]
  2. Office of Infectious Disease, Bureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development
  3. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC: OADS BAA 2016-N-17844]
  4. National Institutes of Health through the MIDAS research network [U54 GM111274]
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  6. IDRC (Preventing Zika disease with novel vector control approaches) [108412]
  7. SANOFI Pasteur
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [1640698] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Response to Zika virus (ZIKV) invasion in Brazil lagged a year from its estimated February 2014 introduction, and was triggered by the occurrence of severe congenital malformations. Dengue (DENV) and chikungunya (CHIKV) invasions tend to show similar response lags. We analyzed geo-coded symptomatic case reports from the city of Merida, Mexico, with the goal of assessing the utility of historical DENV data to infer CHIKV and ZIKV introduction and propagation. About 42% of the 40,028 DENV cases reported during 2008-2015 clustered in 27% of the city, and these clustering areas were where the first CHIKV and ZIKV cases were reported in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Furthermore, the three viruses had significant agreement in their spatio-temporal distribution (Kendall W> 0.63; p< 0.01). Longitudinal DENV data generated patterns indicative of the resulting introduction and transmission patterns of CHIKV and ZIKV, leading to important insights for the surveillance and targeted control to emerging Aedes-borne viruses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available