4.6 Article

Gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution

Journal

PLOS GENETICS
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007375

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DFG Research Fellowships [Ki 1831/1-1]
  2. FAF [FR 3929/1-1]
  3. BBSRC DTP studentship
  4. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [BFU2016-74961-P]
  5. Andalusian Government [B10-396]
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Fellowship [M1059-B09]
  7. NERC [R8/H10/56]
  8. MRC [MR/K001744/1]
  9. BBSRC [BB/J004243/1]
  10. Medical Research Council [MR/K001744/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. BBSRC [1810147] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. MRC [MR/K001744/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Convergent phenotypic evolution is often caused by recurrent changes at particular nodes in the underlying gene regulatory networks (GRNs). The genes at such evolutionary 'hotspots' are thought to maximally affect the phenotype with minimal pleiotropic consequences. This has led to the suggestion that if a GRN is understood in sufficient detail, the path of evolution may be predictable. The repeated evolutionary loss of larval trichomes among Drosophila species is caused by the loss of shavenbaby (svb) expression. svb is also required for development of leg trichomes, but the evolutionary gain of trichomes in the 'naked valley' on T2 femurs in Drosophila melanogaster is caused by reduced microRNA-92a (miR-92a) expression rather than changes in svb. We compared the expression and function of components between the larval and leg trichome GRNs to investigate why the genetic basis of trichome pattern evolution differs in these developmental contexts. We found key differences between the two networks in both the genes employed, and in the regulation and function of common genes. These differences in the GRNs reveal why mutations in svb are unlikely to contribute to leg trichome evolution and how instead miR-92a represents the key evolutionary switch in this context. Our work shows that variability in GRNs across different developmental contexts, as well as whether a morphological feature is lost versus gained, influence the nodes at which a GRN evolves to cause morphological change. Therefore, our findings have important implications for understanding the pathways and predictability of evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available