4.6 Article

Deleting the IF1-like zeta subunit from Paracoccus denitrificans ATP synthase is not sufficient to activate ATP hydrolysis

Journal

OPEN BIOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsob.170206

Keywords

ADP inhibition; ATP hydrolysis; bioenergetics; 1 subunit; oxidative phosphorylation; reversible catalysis

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [U105663141]
  2. Medical Research Council [1948474, MC_UU_00015/2, MC_U105663141] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MC_UU_00015/2, MC_U105663141] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In oxidative phosphorylation, ATP synthases interconvert two forms of free energy: they are driven by the proton-motive force across an energy-transducing membrane to synthesize ATP and displace the ADP/ATP ratio from equilibrium. For thermodynamically efficient energy conversion they must be reversible catalysts. However, in many species ATP synthases are unidirectional catalysts (their rates of ATP hydrolysis are negligible), and in others mechanisms have evolved to regulate or minimize hydrolysis. Unidirectional catalysis by Paracoccus denitrificans ATP synthase has been attributed to its unique zeta subunit, which is structurally analogous to the mammalian inhibitor protein IF1. Here, we used homologous recombination to delete the zeta subunit from the P. denitrificans genome, and compared ATP synthesis and hydrolysis by the wild-type and knockout enzymes in inverted membrane vesicles and the F-1-ATPase subcomplex. ATP synthesis was not affected by loss of the zeta subunit, and the rate of ATP hydrolysis increased by less than twofold, remaining negligible in comparison with the rates of the Escherichia coli and mammalian enzymes. Therefore, deleting the P. denitrificans zeta subunit is not sufficient to activate ATP hydrolysis. We close by considering our conclusions in the light of reversible catalysis and regulation in ATP synthase enzymes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available