4.5 Review

Scaffolds for the repair of bone defects in clinical studies: a systematic review

Journal

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0724-2

Keywords

Scaffolds; Bone regeneration; Clinical

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [8156035, 81560377]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This systematic review aims to summarize the clinical studies on the use of scaffolds in the repair of bony defects. Methods: The relevant articles were searched through PubMed database. The following keywords and search terms were used: scaffolds, patient, clinic, bone repair, bone regeneration, repairing bone defect, repair of bone, osteanagenesis, osteanaphysis, and osteoanagenesis. The articles were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, performed by two reviewers. Results: A total of 373 articles were obtained using PubMed database. After screening, 20 articles were identified as relevant for the purpose of this systematic review. We collected the data of biological scaffolds and synthetic scaffolds. There are eight clinical studies of biological scaffolds included collagen, gelatin, and cellular scaffolds for bone healing. In addition, 12 clinical studies of synthetic scaffolds on HAp, TCP, bonelike, and their complex scaffolds for repairing bone defects were involved in this systematic review. Conclusions: There are a lot of clinical evidences showed that application of scaffolds had a good ability to facilitate bone repair and osteogenesis. However, the ideal and reliable guidelines are insufficiently applied and the number and quality of studies in this field remain to be improved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available