4.5 Article

Blood-brain barrier disruption in CCL2 transgenic mice during pertussis toxin-induced brain inflammation

Journal

FLUIDS AND BARRIERS OF THE CNS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/2045-8118-9-10

Keywords

Chemokine; Central nervous system; Inflammation; Multiple sclerosis; Magnetic resonance imaging

Categories

Funding

  1. Interdisciplinary Health Research Teams program of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The chemokine CCL2 has an important role in the recruitment of inflammatory cells into the central nervous system (CNS). A transgenic mouse model that overexpresses CCL2 in the CNS shows an accumulation of leukocytes within the perivascular space surrounding vessels, and which infiltrate into the brain parenchyma following the administration of pertussis toxin (PTx). Methods: This study used contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantify the extent of blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption in this model pre-and post-PTx administration compared to wild-type mice. Contrast-enhanced MR images were obtained before and 1, 3, and 5 days after PTx injection in each animal. After the final imaging session fluorescent dextran tracers were administered intravenously to each mouse and brains were examined histologically for cellular infiltrates, BBB leakage and tight junction protein. Results: BBB breakdown, defined as a disruption of both the endothelium and glia limitans, was found only in CCL2 transgenic mice following PTx administration and seen on MR images as focal areas of contrast enhancement and histologically as dextrans leaking from blood vessels. No evidence of disruption in endothelial tight junctions was observed. Conclusion: Genetic and environmental stimuli were needed to disrupt the integrity of the BBB in this model of neuroinflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available