4.3 Article

Genomic Selection in Preliminary Yield Trials in a Winter Wheat Breeding Program

Journal

G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages 2735-2747

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1534/g3.118.200415

Keywords

genomic prediction; Triticum aestivum; spatial variation; genotyping-by-sequencing; genomic best linear unbiased prediction; Genomic selection; shared data resources; GenPred

Funding

  1. Hatch project [NEB-22-328, AFRI/2011-68002-30029]
  2. National Institute of Food and Agriculture as part of the International Wheat Yield Partnership, U.S. Department of Agriculture [2017-67007-2593]
  3. USDA [59-0790-4-092]
  4. U.S. Wheat and Barley Scab Initiative
  5. National Research Initiative Competitive from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2011-68002-30029, 2017-67007-25939]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genomic prediction (GP) is now routinely performed in crop plants to predict unobserved phenotypes. The use of predicted phenotypes to make selections is an active area of research. Here, we evaluate GP for predicting grain yield and compare genomic and phenotypic selection by tracking lines advanced. We examined four independent nurseries of F-3.6 and F-3.7 lines trialed at 6 to 10 locations each year. Yield was analyzed using mixed models that accounted for experimental design and spatial variations. Genotype-by-sequencing provided nearly 27,000 high-quality SNPs. Average genomic predictive ability, estimated for each year by randomly masking lines as missing in steps of 10% from 10 to 90%, and using the remaining lines from the same year as well as lines from other years in a training set, ranged from 0.23 to 0.55. The predictive ability estimated for a new year using the other years ranged from 0.17 to 0.28. Further, we tracked lines advanced based on phenotype from each of the four F-3.6 nurseries. Lines with both above average genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) and phenotypic value (BLUP) were retained for more years compared to lines with either above average GEBV or BLUP alone. The number of lines selected for advancement was substantially greater when predictions were made with 50% of the lines from the testing year added to the training set. Hence, evaluation of only 50% of the lines yearly seems possible. This study provides insights to assess and integrate genomic selection in breeding programs of autogamous crops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available