4.2 Article

Exploring the bulk-phase structure of ionic liquid mixtures using small-angle neutron scattering

Journal

FARADAY DISCUSSIONS
Volume 206, Issue -, Pages 265-289

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7fd00167c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF
  2. EPSRC [NSF-CHE-1266032, EP/K032062/1]
  3. University of York
  4. Technical University of Lisbon
  5. Royal Society
  6. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, Portugal [UID/QUI/00100/2013, SFRH/BPD/94291/2013]
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [6-03-435, RB1510160]
  8. EPSRC [EP/P001459/1, EP/K032062/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K032062/1, EP/P001459/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small-angle neutron scattering experiments, supported by molecular dynamics simulations, have been performed on a range of compositions of the [C(2)mim](1-x)[C(12)mim](x)[Tf2N] ionic liquid mixture system. Isotopic contrast variation, through selective deuteration of both cations, has been used to assist in fitting the data to different scattering models. These data, and subsequent fitting, show that the structure of the ionic liquid mixtures changes substantially as a function of composition. Mixtures where x < 0.32 are dominated by aggregates of amphiphilic [C(12)mim](+) ions in the relatively polar [C(2)mim][Tf2N] solvent. Compositions where x > 0.32 can be described as bicontinuous, containing networks of both polar and non-polar domains, where the C12 chains of the [C(12)mim](+) ions percolate through the system to form a continuous non-polar sub-phase. Temperature-dependent scattering experiments suggest that there is relatively little change in bulk structure in these liquids between 20 and 60 degrees C. The presence of water, however, does influence some aspects of the liquid structure in a composition that is rich in [C(2)mim][Tf2N] (where x = 0.24).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available