4.4 Review

The role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for the assessment of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis: a systematic review

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 503-513

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2018.1463158

Keywords

Liver cirrhosis; liver fibrosis; neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; prognosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81470880, 81770583]
  2. Southwest Hospital [SWH2016YQFY-01]
  3. Third Military Medical University Science Foundation of Outstanding Youth [2017YQRC-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is widely used to assess inflammatory diseases. We performed a systematic review to explore the prognostic role of NLR for the assessment of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.Areas covered: We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for the eligible papers which explored the association between NLR and liver fibrosis/cirrhosis or investigated the prognostic value of NLR in cirrhotic patients.Expert commentary: In accordance with assessment of liver fibrosis stage, we classified papers into four subgroups by etiology. For the patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) there was a significant association between NLR and fibrosis stage and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS), while NLR had a negative correlation with fibrosis stage for the patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). As for the patients with and chronic hepatitis C (CHC), NLR might not be significantly associated with fibrosis stage. Moreover, NLR seemed to be significantly useful for predicting outcomes in cirrhotic patients. Hence, NLR might be associated with liver fibrosis stage, especially in patients with NAFLD. Furthermore, NLR might be a useful biomarker for evaluating the prognosis in cirrhotic patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available