4.5 Article

The Information Geometry of Mirror Descent

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 1451-1457

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2015.2388583

Keywords

Online learning; information geometry; differential geometry; natural gradient; mirror descent

Funding

  1. NSF through the Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute [DMS-1127914]
  2. NSF [CCF-1049290]
  3. NIH through the Systems Biology Project [5P50-GM081883]
  4. AFOSR [FA9550-10-1-0436]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1209155] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We prove the equivalence of two online learning algorithms: 1) mirror descent and 2) natural gradient descent. Both mirror descent and natural gradient descent are generalizations of online gradient descent when the parameter of interest lies on a non-Euclidean manifold. Natural gradient descent selects the steepest descent along a Riemannian manifold by multiplying the standard gradient by the inverse of the metric tensor. Mirror descent induces non-Euclidean structure by solving iterative optimization problems using different proximity functions. In this paper, we prove that mirror descent induced by Bregman divergence proximity functions is equivalent to the natural gradient descent algorithm on the dual Riemannian manifold. We use techniques from convex analysis and connections between Riemannian manifolds, Bregman divergences, and convexity to prove this result. This equivalence between natural gradient descent and mirror descent, implies that: 1) mirror descent is the steepest descent direction along the Riemannian manifold corresponding to the choice of Bregman divergence and 2) mirror descent with log-likelihood loss applied to parameter estimation in exponential families asymptotically achieves the classical Cramer-Rao lower bound.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available