4.5 Article

Human organoid cultures: transformative new tools for human virus studies

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN VIROLOGY
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 79-86

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2018.04.001

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U18-TR000552, UH3-TR00003, U19-AI116497, R01-AI080656, R01-AI105101, P30-DK56338]
  2. Food Research Initiative Competitive grant from the CS Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2011-68003-30395]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies of human infectious diseases have been limited by the paucity of functional models that mimic normal human physiology and pathophysiology. Recent advances in the development of multicellular, physiologically active organotypic cultures produced from embryonic and pluripotent stem cells, as well as from stem cells isolated from biopsies and surgical specimens are allowing unprecedented new studies and discoveries about host-microbe interactions. Here, we summarize recent developments in the use of organoids for studying human viral pathogens, including intestinal infections with human rotavirus, norovirus, enteroviruses and adenoviruses (intestinal organoids and enteroids), neuronal infections with Zika virus (cerebral organoids) and respiratory infections with respiratory syncytial virus in (lung bud organoids). Biologic discovery of host-specific genetic and epigenetic factors affecting infection, and responses to infection that lead to disease are possible with the use of organoid cultures. Continued development to increase the complexity of these cultures by including components of the normal host tissue microenvironment such as immune cells, blood vessels and microbiome, will facilitate studies on human viral pathogenesis, and advance the development of platforms for pre-clinical evaluation of vaccines, antivirals and therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available