4.8 Article

Transcription Factor IRF8 Governs Enhancer Landscape Dynamics in Mononuclear Phagocyte Progenitors

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages 2628-2641

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.048

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)/Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) [26670238, 15H04860, 221S0002, 16H06279, 16K21271]
  2. Yokohama Foundation for Advancement of Medical Science
  3. Fund for Creation of Innovation Centers for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research Areas Program of MEXT
  4. JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H06279, 15H04860, 26670238] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monocytes and dendritic cells (DCs), mononuclear phagocytes essential for immune responses, develop from hematopoietic stem cells via monocyte- DC progenitors (MDPs). The molecular basis of their development remains unclear. Because promoter-distal enhancers are key to cell fate decisions, we analyzed enhancer landscapes during mononuclear phagocyte development in vivo. Monocyteand DC-specific enhancers were gradually established at progenitor stages before the expression of associated genes. Of the transcription factors predicted to bind to these enhancers, IRF8, essential for monocyte and DC development, was found to be required for the establishment of these enhancers, particularly those common to both monocyte and DC lineages. Although Irf8(-/-) mononuclear phagocyte progenitors, including MDPs, displayed grossly normal gene expression patterns, their enhancer landscapes resembled that of an upstream progenitor population. Our results illustrate the dynamic process by which key transcription factors regulate enhancer formation and, therefore, direct future gene expression to achieve mononuclear phagocyte development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available