4.8 Article

Loss of Sfpq Causes Long-Gene Transcriptopathy in the Brain

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 1326-1341

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.141

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (MEXT, JSPS KAKENHI) [19500269, 25500288, 21249013, 15H05721]
  2. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
  4. Asian CORE Program of JSPS
  5. iCeMS Cross-Disciplinary Research Promotion Project of Kyoto University
  6. Fujiwara Memorial Foundation
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21249013, 15H05721, 19500269] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genes specifically expressed in neurons contain members with extended long introns. Longer genes present a problem with respect to fulfilment of gene length transcription, and evidence suggests that dys-regulation of long genes is a mechanism underlying neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. Here, we report the discovery that RNA-binding protein Sfpq is a critical factor for maintaining transcriptional elongation of long genes. We demonstrate that Sfpq co-transcriptionally binds to long introns and is required for sustaining long-gene transcription by RNA polymerase II through mediating the interaction of cyclin-dependent kinase 9 with the elongation complex. Phenotypically, Sfpq disruption caused neuronal apoptosis in developing mouse brains. Expression analysis of Sfpq-regulated genes revealed specific downregulation of developmentally essential neuronal genes longer than 100 kb in Sfpq-disrupted brains; those genes are enriched in associations with neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases. The identified molecular machinery yields directions for targeted investigations of the association between long-gene transcriptopathy and neuronal diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available