4.6 Article

Comparison of Lamina Cribrosa Thickness in Normal Tension Glaucoma Patients With Unilateral Visual Field Defect

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 159, Issue 3, Pages 512-518

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.11.034

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To compare the lamina cribrosa thickness, measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS OCT), between each eye of normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients with unilateral visual field (VF) defect and to investigate the correlation between lamina cribrosa thickness and VF loss. DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional study. METHODS: Optic nerve heads were scanned using SS OCT, and laminar thickness was measured on mid-superior, central, and mid-inferior regions of vertical midline of the optic disc. The inter-eye differences of lamina cribrosa thickness in NTG patients with unilateral VF defect and the intra-eye difference of lamina cribrosa thickness in VF-affected eyes were analyzed using the paired t test. We evaluated the correlation between lamina cribrosa thickness and mean deviation, measured using standard automated perimetry, in NTG patients. RESULTS: This study included 102 eyes in 51 NTG patients with unilateral VF defect and 47 eyes in 47 normal subjects without glaucomatous change in either eye. The mean lamina cribrosa thickness of normal fellow eyes was thicker than VF-affected eyes in NTG patients (P < .001), but thinner than normal subject eyes (P < .001). Within VF-affected eyes, lamina cribrosa thickness of regions correlated with visual field defect was thinner than horizontally contralateral locations (P < .001). The mean devlation was statistically correlated with inter-eye difference of lamina cribrosa thickness in NTG patients (n = 51; r(2) = 0.12; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The lamina cribrosa was thinner in VF-unaffected eyes of NTG patients than in normal subject eyes, in VF-affected eyes than in normal fellow eyes of NTG patients, and in regions correlated with visual field loss than in horizontally contralateral ones in VF-affected eyes. (C) 2015 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available