4.3 Article

Simultaneous Determination of Fourteen Veterinary Antibiotics in Animal Feces by Solid Phase Extraction and High Performance Liquid Chromatography

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 213-217

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2040(11)60529-X

Keywords

Animal feces; Veterinary antibiotics; Solid phase extraction; High performance liquid chromatograph

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [20977010]
  2. Special Fund for Environmental Protection Research in the Public Interest of China [200909042]
  3. National Water Pollution Control and Management Technology Major Projects of China [2008ZX07209-007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An efficient method for simultaneous determination of 14 veterinary antibiotics in animal feces by high-performance liquid chromatography was established under optimizing pretreatment and detection conditions. The results showed that 14 drugs could be separated thoroughly by 1% of acetic acid solution (pH 2.6) and acetonitrile. The detection limits for tetracyclines (TCs), sulfonamides (SAs), fluoroquinolones (FQs) and tylosin (TYL) were 35-90 mu g kg(-1), 12-28 mu g kg(-1), 9-17 mu g kg(-1) and 19 mu g kg(-1), respectively (the signal-to-noise ratio was 3). After being extracted with a mixture of 50% methanol and 50% buffer solution, enriched and cleaned-up by hydrophi-liclipophilic balanced cartage (HLB), the corresponding recoveries were 58%-75%, 74%-93%, 74%-80% and 85% at a concentration of 1 mg kg-1 and were 66%-83%, 91%-101%, 80%-88% and 68% at a concentration of 10 mg kg(-1), respectively. The method was used to analyze the 14 antibiotics in samples of pig, chicken and dairy cow feces, which had been collected from concentrated animal feeding operations in Liaoning province. These drugs were observed in the range 0.75-22.34 mg kg(-1) for TCs, 0.10-1.71 mg kg(-1) for SAs, 0.38-4.46 mg kg(-1) for FQs and 0.23-0.35 mg kg(-1) for TYL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available