4.7 Article

Fabrication and Characterization of Chitosan-Hyaluronic Acid Scaffolds with Varying Stiffness for Glioblastoma Cell Culture

Journal

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
Volume 7, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201800295

Keywords

chitosan; glioblastoma; hyaluronic acid; scaffolds; tumor models

Funding

  1. NIH [NIH/NCI R01CA172455, 510 OD016240]
  2. Kyocera Professor Endowment
  3. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE-1256082]
  4. Ruth L. Kirschstein NIH Training grant [T32CA138312]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The invasive and recurrent nature of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is linked to a small subpopulation of cancer cells, which are self-renewing, resistant to standard treatment regimens, and induce formation of new tumors. Matrix stiffness is implicated in the regulation of cell proliferation, drug resistance, and reversion to a more invasive phenotype. Therefore, understanding the relationship between matrix stiffness and tumor cell behavior is vital to develop appropriate in vitro tumor models. Here, chitosan-hyaluronic acid (CHA) polyelectrolyte complex scaffolds are fabricated with statistically significant stiffness variances to characterize the effect of scaffold stiffness on morphology, proliferation, drug resistance, and gene expression in human glioblastoma cells (U-87 MG). All scaffolds support GBM proliferation over a 12-day culture period, yet larger spheroids are observed in scaffolds with higher stiffness. Additionally, GBM cells cultured in stiffer CHA scaffolds prove significantly more resistant to the common chemotherapeutic temozolomide. Moreover, the stiffer 8% CHA scaffolds exhibit an increase in expression of drug resistance and invasion related genes compared to 2D culture. CHA scaffolds present a tunable microenvironment for enhanced tumor cell malignancy and may provide a valuable in vitro microenvironment for studying tumor progression and screening anticancer therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available