4.5 Article

Effect of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation on Upper Limb Dexterity in Patients with Parkinson Disease

Journal

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages E206-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.014

Keywords

Bradykinesia; Deep brain stimulation; Dexterity; Dopaminergic medication; Parkinson disease; Subthalamic nucleus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) on dexterity remains controversial despite its recognition as an effective strategy for Parkinson disease. The present study investigated the efficacy of STN-DBS for ameliorating bradykinesia and dexterity compared with dopaminergic medications. METHODS: Part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale was used for the evaluation of bradykinesia, whereas the Purdue Pegboard Test and the Box and Block test were selected for dexterity. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that bradykinesia is significantly improved with both DBS and dopaminergic medication, whereas dexterity is improved only with DBS. Dopaminergic medication did not show a satisfactory efficacy on dexterity, and there was little synergistic effect of dopaminergic medication and STN-DBS for improving dexterity associated with Parkinson disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that DBS is potentially more effective than dopaminergic medications for improving dexterity. The disparities in efficacy for bradykinesia and dexterity between DBS and dopaminergic medication hint at the potential mechanisms of STN-DBS. We speculate that DBS follows at least 2 different mechanisms for improving parkinsonian symptoms: 1) the dopaminergic system, primarily for the improvement of bradykinesia and 2) the nondopaminergic system, for the improvement of dexterity. This hypothesis requires further verification and investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available