4.7 Article

Magnetic Field Enhanced Superconductivity in Epitaxial Thin Film WTe2

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24736-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Center for Photonic and Multiscale Nanomaterials [DMR 1120923]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. US Army Research Office [W911NF-16-1-0310]
  4. NSF [DMR 1707620, DMR-157490]
  5. Department of Energy [DE-SC0008110]
  6. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1307744]
  7. Office of Naval Research through the Young Investigator Prize [N00014-15-1-2382]
  8. National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation [DMR-1428226]
  9. State of Florida
  10. DOE
  11. Nakajima Foundation
  12. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [F031543]
  13. KSAS General Fund Start-up at Johns Hopkins
  14. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0008110] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In conventional superconductors an external magnetic field generally suppresses superconductivity. This results from a simple thermodynamic competition of the superconducting and magnetic free energies. In this study, we report the unconventional features in the superconducting epitaxial thin film tungsten telluride (WTe2). Measuring the electrical transport properties of Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE) grown WTe2 thin films with a high precision rotation stage, we map the upper critical field H-c2 at different temperatures T. We observe the superconducting transition temperature T-c is enhanced by in-plane magnetic fields. The upper critical field H-c2 is observed to establish an unconventional non-monotonic dependence on temperature. We suggest that this unconventional feature is due to the lifting of inversion symmetry, which leads to the enhancement of H-c2 in Ising superconductors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available