4.7 Article

Assessment of Fv/Fm absorbed by wheat canopies employing in-situ hyperspectral vegetation indexes

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27902-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0300405]
  2. Jiangsu Agricultural Industry Technology System [SXGC[2017]295]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41271415, 31771711]
  4. Fostering Science Foundation of Yangzhou University [2016CXJ060, 2017CXJ061]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  6. research project of teaching reform in Yangzhou University [YZUJX2017-22B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chlorophyll fluorescence parameter of F-v/F-m, as an important index for evaluating crop yields and biomass, is key to guide crop management. However, the shortage of good hyperspectral data can hinder the accurate assessment of wheat F-v/F-m. In this research, the relationships between wheat canopy F-v/F-m and in-situ hyperspectral vegetation indexes were explored to develop a strategy for accurate F-v/F-m assessment. F-v/F-m had the highest coefficients with normalized pigments chlorophyll ratio index (NPCI) and the medium terrestrial chlorophyll index (MTCI). Both NPCI and MTCI were increased with the increase in F-v/F-m. However, NPCI value ceased to increase as F-v/F-m reached 0.61. MTCI had a descending trend when F-v/F-m value was higher than 0.61. A piecewise F-v/F-m assessment model with NPCI and MTCI regression variables was established when F-v/F-m value was <= 0.61 and >0.61, respectively. The model increased the accuracy of assessment by up to 16% as compared with theF(v)/F-m assessment model based on a single vegetation index. Our study indicated that it was feasible to apply NPCI and MTCI to assess wheat F-v/F-m and to establish a piecewise F-v/F-m assessment model that can overcome the limitations from vegetation index saturation under high F-v/F-m value.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available