4.6 Article

Effects of Shexiangbaoxin pills on the expression of cardiac α1- and β-adrenergic receptor subtypes in rat hearts with heart failure induced by myocardial infarction

Journal

CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 125, Issue 9, Pages 1556-1562

Publisher

CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2012.09.007

Keywords

heart failure; myocardial infarction; rat; adrenergic receptor

Funding

  1. Chinese Integrated TCM-WM Scientific Research Foundation [2008-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Chronic heart failure (CHF) had been characterized as an activated sympathetic system leading to the alteration of adrenergic receptor (AR) levels in the heart. Thus far, not much research has been done with regard to traditional Chinese medical treatment for CHF. We investigated the effect of Shexiangbaoxin pills (SXBXP) on the function of the heart and the expression of alpha(1)-AR and beta-AR subtypes in the messenger RNA (mRNA) levels and protein levels of non-infarction left ventricular tissue from rats with CHF induced by myocardial infarction. Methods Models of CHF were established by left anterior descending coronary artery ligature. Fifty-four Wistar rats were randomly divided into five groups: normal control group (group A), sham operation group (group B), CHF model group (group C), positive medicine control group (group D), and small-dose SXBXP group (group E) and large-dose SXBXP group (group F), deployed intragastrically. Cardiac function was examined by echocardiography before and after therapy; mRNA expressed levels were measured by semiquantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for beta(1)-AR, beta(2)-AR, beta(3)-AR, alpha(1A)-AR, alpha(1B)-AR, and alpha(1D)-AR; protein levels were measured by Western blotting analysis for beta(1)-AR, beta(2)-AR, alpha(1A)-AR, alpha(1B)-AR, and alpha(1D)-AR in non-infarction left ventricular tissue. Results There was no significant difference in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between groups A and B. Compared to group B, LVEF of groups C, D, E, and F were significantly decreased (P<0.01) before therapy. After therapy, compared to group C, LVEF of group F was significantly improved (P<0.05). Compared to group B, beta(1)-AR and alpha(1B)-AR expressed levels were markedly decreased (P<0.05), alpha(1A)-AR and beta(3)-AR were significantly increased (P<0.01) in group C, and in both mRNA and protein expressed levels beta(2)-AR had no significant difference between groups B and C (P>0.05). alpha(1D)-AR mRNA levels were unchanged in each group (P>0.05), but alpha(1D)-AR protein level was significantly decreased in group C (P<0.05). After treatment, compared to group C, mRNA levels of beta(1)-AR and alpha(1B)-AR were significantly increased (P<0.05 and P<0.01), and alpha(1A)-AR was markedly decreased in groups D, E, and F (P<0.05). beta(3)-AR level significantly declined in both groups D and F (P<0.01), but beta(2)-AR and alpha(1D)-AR expressed levels remained unchanged in each group (P>0.05). Protein levels, compared to group C, beta(1)-AR was significantly increased (P<0.01, P<0.05, and P<0.01) and alpha(1A)-AR was markedly decreased in groups D, E, and F (P<0.05, P<0.01, and P<0.01). beta(2)-AR expressed level was significantly increased in group F (P<0.05). alpha(1B)-AR expressed level was significantly increased in both groups E and F (P<0.05), and alpha(1D)-AR was remarkably increased in both groups D and F (P<0.05). Conclusions After SXBXP treatment, LVEF was increased and cardiac function was significantly ameliorated in rats with CHF. The therapeutic effect of SXBXP may be related to better blood supply for myocardium and up-regulation of beta(1)-AR and alpha(1B)-AR, and down-regulation of alpha(1A)-AR and beta(3)-AR. The results show that SXBXP can be used in treatment of CHF and the therapeutic effect of large-dose SXBXP is superior to small-dose SXBXP. Chin Med J 2012;125(9):1556-1562

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available