4.8 Article

Ripple Eliminator to Smooth DC-Bus Voltage and Reduce the Total Capacitance Required

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages 2224-2235

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2014.2353016

Keywords

DC microgrids; dc-bus voltage; electrolytic capacitors; power quality; pulsewidth modulation (PWM) rectifiers; reliability; ripple eliminators; voltage ripples

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, U.K. [EP/I038586/1, EP/J001333/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J001333/2, EP/I038586/1, EP/J001333/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/J001333/2, EP/J001333/1, EP/I038586/1, EP/E036503/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bulky electrolytic capacitors, which are often needed in dc systems to filter out voltage ripples, considerably reduce power density and system reliability. In this paper, a ripple eliminator, which is a bidirectional buck-boost converter terminated with an auxiliary capacitor, is adopted to replace bulky capacitors in dc systems. The voltage ripples on the terminals (i.e., the dc bus) can be transferred to the auxiliary capacitor, and the ripples on the auxiliary capacitor can vary in a wide range. Moreover, the average voltage of the auxiliary capacitor can be controlled either lower or higher than the dc-bus voltage, which offers a wide operational range for the ripple eliminator and also the possibility of further reducing the auxiliary capacitance. Hence, the total capacitance required can be much smaller than the originally needed. After proposing a control strategy to transfer the voltage ripples to the auxiliary capacitor, three control strategies are proposed to regulate the auxiliary-capacitor voltage to maintain proper operation. Intensive experimental results are presented to demonstrate the performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available