4.7 Article

Dual Role of CREB in The Regulation of VSMC Proliferation: Mode of Activation Determines Pro- or Anti-Mitogenic Function

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23199-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. British Heart Foundation [PG/14/82/31126]
  2. NIHR Bristol BRU in Cardiovascular Medicine
  3. British Heart Foundation [PG/14/82/31126] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation has been implicated in the development of restenosis after angioplasty, vein graft intimal thickening and atherogenesis. We investigated the mechanisms underlying positive and negative regulation of VSMC proliferation by the transcription factor cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREB). Incubation with the cAMP elevating stimuli, adenosine, prostacyclin mimetics or low levels of forksolin activated CREB without changing CREB phosphorylation on serine-133 but induced nuclear translocation of the CREB co-factors CRTC-2 and CRTC-3. Overexpression of CRTC-2 or -3 significantly increased CREB activity and inhibited VSMC proliferation, whereas CRTC-2/3 silencing inhibited CREB activity and reversed the anti-mitogenic effects of adenosine A2B receptor agonists. By contrast, stimulation with serum or PDGF(BB) significantly increased CREB activity, dependent on increased CREB phosphorylation at serine-133 but not on CRTC-2/3 activation. CREB silencing significantly inhibited basal and PDGF induced proliferation. These data demonstrate that cAMP activation of CREB, which is CRTC2/3 dependent and serine-133 independent, is anti-mitogenic. Growth factor activation of CREB, which is serine-133-dependent and CRTC2/3 independent, is pro-mitogenic. Hence, CREB plays a dual role in the regulation of VSMC proliferation with the mode of activation determining its pro-or anti-mitogenic function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available