4.6 Article

Risk Factors for Geographic Atrophy After Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injections for Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 159, Issue 2, Pages 285-292

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.035

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To describe the risk factors for the development of geographic atrophy (GA) following intravitreal ranibizumab injection treatment for retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). DESIGN: Retrospective interventional series. METHODS: Forty-three eyes (38 South Korean patients) from patients being treated for naive RAP with intravitreal ranibinunab injection were included in this study. All patients were treated with an initial series of 3 monthly loading injections, followed by further injections as required. Baseline ocular characteristics and lesion features assessed using fluorescein angiography (FA), indocyanine angiography (ICGA), and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) were evaluated as potential risk factors for GA through 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: At 2 years follow-up, GA had developed in 16 of 43 eyes (37.2%). The mean number of ranibizumab injections was 7.52 +/- 2.11. Using multiple logistic regression, thinning of the subfoveal choroid at baseline (odds ratio [OR], 0.955; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.929-0.982; P = .002), presence of reticular pseudodrusen (OR, 1.092; 95% CI, 1.017-1.485; P = .039), and presence of GA in the fellow eye at baseline (OR, 1.433; 95% CI, 1.061-1.935; P = .025) were identified as significant risk factors for GA development. CONCLUSIONS: GA developed in 37.2% of eyes with RAP during the 24 months following intravitreal ranibizumab injections. Subfoveal choroidal thinning at baseline, the presence of reticular pseudodrusen, and the presence of GA in the fellow eye at baseline were associated with increased risk of GA development after treatment. (C) 2015 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available