4.7 Article

Changes in total homocysteine levels after acute stroke and recurrence of stroke

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25398-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81571057, 81300947]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Tianjin Municipal Health Bureau [2014KR10, 2013KY15]
  3. Tianjin Science and Technology Project [16ZXMJSY00010]
  4. Key Research Project of Tianjin Public Health [14KG117]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is not known how total homocysteine (tHcy) levels change during the transition from acute stroke to post-stroke convalescence or whether tHcy changes occurring after the acute period are associated with recurrence of cerebro-cardiovascular events. Levels of tHcy were measured during acute ischemia and again after three months. Patients were followed for a median of 18 (range: 12-36) months. A total of 2800 patients who had at least two tHcy measurements were enrolled between February 2012 and June 2014; 2587 patients presented with ischemic stroke and 213 presented with cerebral hemorrhage. During the follow-up period, 220 (7.9%) patients experienced another ischemic event. After adjusting for additional cardiovascular risk factors, patients with the highest levels of tHcy (fourth quartile; > 15.5 mu mol/L) had a 1.76-fold increased risk of a recurrence (adjusted HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.11-3.08) as compared to patients with the lowest levels of tHcy (lowest quartile; <= 9.65 mu mol/L). Additional analysis by subgroup indicated that this correlation was only significant for patients with large-artery atherosclerosis ischemia (adjusted HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.13-3.55). Elevated tHcy during the convalescent phase of acute stroke was independently associated with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, especially in those patients with large-vessel atherosclerosis ischemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available